Colorado Supreme Court Repeatedly Quotes Trump Out of Context to Ban People From Voting For Him

Overview

Even though Donald Trump is now the nation’s front-running presidential candidate in both polls and betting odds, the Colorado Supreme Court has issued a 4–3 decision that bans the citizens of Colorado from voting for him. The supposed grounds for their decision is that Trump can’t be the president under the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment because he “engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021.”

To support that claim, the Colorado judges—all appointed by Democrats—repeatedly quote Trump out of context to make it seem like he said things that he did not.

“Very Different Rules”

In their decision, the majority of judges assert that Trump “told his supporters” on January 6th that “they were ‘allowed to go by very different rules’” and that those words “were intended to produce imminent lawless action.”

The judges repeat the phrase “very different rules” four different times, but they never reveal the words that immediately follow. These prove that Trump was not talking about his “supporters,” as the judges allege, but Mike Pence. Per the transcript of Trump’s speech:

When you catch somebody in a fraud, you’re allowed to go by very different rules. So I hope Mike has the courage to do what he has to do.

Those words refer to Trump’s call for Pence to send the electors “back to the States to recertify,” as Trump said in the same speech.

The broader context also reveals that Trump was speaking about Congress, a point he raised four times in his speech. That’s because Congress was debating on that day whether the 2020 election was carried out in accord with the U.S. Constitution and whether the federal Electoral Count Act allowed Congress to object to “States that did not follow the constitutional requirement for selecting electors.”

Trump’s statement was true at the time, as shown by the text of the Electoral Count Act, which specified very different rules for cases of potential fraud. However, Democrats, several Republicans, and President Biden changed this law in 2022 to remove certain checks against election fraud.

“Fight Like Hell”

Echoing the 2021 impeachment resolution of Trump, the Colorado judges claim that Trump “gave a speech in which he literally exhorted his supporters to fight at the Capitol.” Their alleged proof of this is that Trump “used the word ‘fight’ or variations of it” 20 times on January 6.

Yet, the judges only cite the following cases of Trump using the word “fight,” none of which literally calls for violence:

  • “Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his back. It’s like a boxer. And we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. And we’re going to have to fight much harder.”
  • “And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

Seemingly ignorant of the fact that the words “literal” and “coded” have opposing meanings, the judges claim that the statements above were “coded language” that Trump used as “literal calls to violence.”

More importantly, the full record of Trump’s remarks show that he was talking about legal and verbal fighting, not physical violence. Ten of the 20 times in which Trump used the word “fight” are found in the following statements where the context is unmistakable:

  • Rudy Giuliani has “guts, he fights. He fights.”
  • “Jim Jordan, and some of these guys. They’re out there fighting the House.”
  • “If they don’t fight, we have to primary the hell out of the ones that don’t fight. You primary them.”
  • “The American people do not believe the corrupt fake news anymore. They have ruined their reputation. But it used to be that they’d argue with me, I’d fight. So I’d fight, they’d fight. I’d fight, they’d fight. … They had their point of view, I had my point of view. But you’d have an argument. Now what they do is they go silent. It’s called suppression. And that’s what happens in a communist country.”

Exposing the double standards of those who claim that Trump’s use of the word “fight” was a call for violence, video footage shows Congressional Democrats using the word “fight” more than 200 times, including more than a dozen times in which they used the exact phrase for which they impeached Trump: “fight like hell.”

“To the Capitol”

Another phrase that the Colorado judges focus on is “to the Capitol,” which Trump used three times in his speech. The judges allege that these words were part of Trump’s plot to engage “in an insurrection” by physically preventing “Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential election and stop the peaceful transfer of power.”

In reality, the context shows the polar opposite is true. The first time Trump used the phrase “to the Capitol,” he said:

We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.

The judges bury the fact that Trump told his supporters to protest “peacefully and patriotically”—127 pages into their ruling. Then they dismiss this fact in two sentences by arguing that Trump told the crowd an hour later to “fight like hell” just before he told them to go to the Capitol. Here again, the full context of Trump’s words reveals no explicit or implicit calls for violence:

We’re going walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.

The same applies to Trump’s other use of the phrase “to the Capitol,” in which he called for a protest to sway the votes of “weak” Republicans, not to stop the proceedings:

So we’re going to, we’re going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we’re going to the Capitol and we’re going to try and give—the Democrats are hopeless. They’re never voting for anything, not even one vote. But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones, because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.

Conclusion

Near the end of their ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court adjudicates whether Trump intended to “produce violent or lawless action.” They then cram all of their out-of-context quotes into a single sentence which asserts that Trump urged his supporters to go “to the Capitol,” “fight like hell,” and go by “very different rules.”

In reality, the full context of Trump’s words show that he told his supporters to:

  • go “to the Capitol” peacefully and patriotically.
  • “fight like hell” politically and verbally.
  • encourage Mike Pence and Congress to follow the “very different rules” that federal law specified for cases of potential election fraud.

James D. Agresti is the president of Just Facts, a research institute dedicated to publishing facts about public policies and teaching research skills.

By James D. Agresti

Read Original Article on JustFactsDaily.com

Just Facts Daily
Just Facts Dailyhttps://www.justfacts.com/
Just Facts Daily publishes comprehensive and rigorously documented facts about public policy issues for Just Facts, a research and educational institute.

Columns

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied, Prosecute Jeffrey Goldberg!

Jeffrey Goldberg reported on his mistaken inclusion in a signal chat as a hit piece on Trump. Should he be prosecuted under the Espionage Act?

Zelensky Has No Feasible Alternative To Accepting Trump’s Lopsided Resource Deal

Trump warned Zelensky he will have “some problems – big, big problems” if he “tries to back out of the rare earth deal” amidst reports agreement is lopsided.

DOGE and Musk Recover Deleted Computer Files

Elon Musk and his “Geek Squad” discovered an entire terabyte of data was deleted from government servers from the office of the “Institute of Peace”.

A Simple Question

What is a woman? Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can answer the question. Everyone, that is, except Democrats.

Democrats Tesla Takedown is a Proven Astro Turf Movement

Elon Musk and other journalistic leaders like Joe Rogan have been asking the critical question, “Who is behind the organization of these Tesla protests?”

News

Pentagon Watchdog Launches Investigation Into Hegseth Over Use of Signal

The inspector general for the Department of Defense is investigating Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his use of the messaging app Signal.

US Layoffs Top 275,000 in March, Driven by Government Job Cuts: Report

Layoffs announced by U.S.-based employers soared in March to highest level since COVID-19 pandemic, with govt job cuts accounting for most headcount reduction.

Dow Jones Drops 1,500 Points a Day After Trump Tariff Announcement

U.S. stock indexes dropped after Trump's sweeping tariffs of 10 percent or higher, with Dow Jones plunging by 1,500 points at one point in early trading.

7 Takeaways From Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff Roll Out

Trump announced sweeping trade policy changes, introducing what he called “reciprocal tariffs” for all countries and declaring it “Liberation Day in America.”

ACLU Sues Trump Admin Over Canceled Grants Tied to DEI, Gender Identity Research

ACLU, public health orgs, unions, and researchers, filed federal lawsuit accusing NIH of unlawfully canceling research grants due to political and ideological pressure.

US Immigration Services Drops 3rd Gender Option

US immigration services agency officially updated policy to recognize only two biological sexes—male and female—for all immigration-related doc and benefit requests.

Transgender Covenant School Killer Planned Attack for Years, Final Police Report Says

Transgender shooter in mass killing at Christian school in Nashville, TN was an alumnus motivated by a quest for notoriety, final police report concludes.

Supreme Court Reviews South Carolina’s Medicaid Funding Block on Planned Parenthood

U.S. Supreme Court weighed whether South Carolina can stop abortion provider Planned Parenthood from taking part in state’s Medicaid program.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central