The Novel Children of Alabama

Contact Your Elected Officials

Unique? They are. They are quiet, polite and they never want you to โ€œtake me to the mall.โ€ But if you could ask them what they do want they would likely say, โ€œTo liveโ€“like everyone else.โ€ They are called โ€œextrauterine children.โ€ And the controversy surrounding them isn’t going away anytime soon. The concerns they conjure in the American psyche deal with inflammatory issues in our societyโ€“issues many have not wanted to consider or worse, admit: when life begins, right-to-life, is an embryo a human being, what rights do embryos have, when does life achieve personhood and rights under the Constitution, bioethics, even eugenics.

The Alabama Supreme Court in February of this year created chaos and hysteria. Politicians and reproductive medicine advocates were particularly exercised with no small amount of what the Bible calls โ€œgnashing of teethโ€ in the mainstream press. Terms like โ€œChristian nationalismโ€ were invoked to hype the moment and draw attention to one’s agenda, one’s cause celeb. Controversy arose after the court issued a decision declaring cryogenically frozen embryos to be โ€œextrauterine children,โ€ human beings with โ€˜personhoodโ€™โ€“a right to liveโ€“to life.

In LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.C. a fertility clinic that neglected to properly secure its frozen embryo nursery from a prying patient was found in breach of Alabamaโ€™s Wrongful Death of a Minor Statute, after several embryos were killed. The parents of the dead embryos were within their rights to sue the clinic, the court found.

The Alabama case is of paramount importance. It essentially forces America to deal with two pivotal issues we have been grappling with for years. First, with respect to the issue of right-to-life, the jurists made the law follow science. The overwhelming consensus among biological scientists is that life begins with conception at fertilization, thus an embryo is aliveโ€“it has life. Steven Andrew Jacobs of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, University of Chicago writing in Issues Law Med. 2021 Fall, โ€œThe Scientific Consensus on When a Human’s Life Beginsโ€ is clear in his assessment:

โ€œPeer-reviewed journals in the biological and life sciences literature have published articles that represent the biological view that a human’s life begins at fertilization (“the fertilization view”). As those statements are typically offered without explanation or citation, the fertilization view seems to be uncontested by the editors, reviewers, and authors who contribute to scientific journals. Overall, 95% of all biologists reviewed affirmed the biological view that a human’s life begins at fertilization (5212 out of 5502).โ€ Up until the time of the Alabama case, that is where the matter stood. Life begins at conception, but no court or legislature (federal or state) has dared (politically) to comment on the status of that life as a โ€˜human beingโ€™. The hesitation occurs because with the status of humanness comes the delicate issue of personhood. And with the latter comes the issue of rights. If embryos are humans and therefore persons, what rights do they have under the Constitution? Are they protected by the 14th Amendmentโ€™s equal protection and due process clauses under the law? The Alabama Supreme Court seems to think so.

The Court held that any exceptions for the wrongful death statute not to cover โ€˜extrauterine childrenโ€™ would violate the 14th Amendmentโ€™s equal protection clause. The latter prohibits states from withholding protections from people based upon โ€œimmutable features of their birth or ancestry,โ€ according to Justice Mitchellโ€™s opinion for the majority.

The second issue the court dealt with is that of personhood. At this point the justices potentially stepped outside of science and into the realm of society and culture. By referring to the embryos as โ€˜extrauterine childrenโ€™ (those conceived outside the womb), the court bestowed the status of humanness (personhood) on them. And as we spoke of earlier, that means the politically thorny issue of Constitutional rights comes to the fore. Thus, pandemonium ensues amongst the media, politicians and those with a vested interest in the controversyโ€“reproductive rights activists and prospective parents through the process of IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).

There is considerable fallout from various public interest groups with an agenda (IVF clinics and doctors, abortion advocates, reproductive rights advocates, medical reproductive associations, anti religious groups, secularists, etc.). All have joined in the furor over the case.

We should, before proceeding further, understand the magnitude of the issues involved. Consider that there are more than a million embryos stored in freezers across the United States.

For the moment, in vitro fertilization (IVF), the way it is currently practiced, is deemed ethically acceptable by the medical community; however, research with human embryos (which often damages or kills them) is typically employed to improve IVF success. โ€œSuch technology raises serious ethical concerns which are in need of constant revisitingโ€ (George Anifandis et al. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022 Jun.).

For those unfamiliar with the IVF process, it is full of office visits and tests. IVF patients take hormones for one to two weeks to stimulate their ovaries which produce many mature eggs. These eggs are then collected via a surgical procedure and fertilized with sperm in a laboratory. The embryos produced are monitored, often biopsied and frozen for further testing. At some point an embryo is implanted in the uterus. The IVF process can take up to two months to complete.

Throughout the process of fertilization, development and testing embryos in a laboratory, as many as 50% to 70% of embryos will not survive. In other words with IVF, it’s trial and error.

There are, of course, other voices in America which acknowledge embryonic life, but based on cultural distinctions reject the idea of embryos actually being human or having rights.

Liah Greenfeld Ph.D. writing in The Modern Mind for Psychology Today August 16, 2013 โ€œWhen Does Human Life Begin?โ€ offers the view of humanness from a psychologistโ€™s perspective. Her view is essentially that culture distinguishes humanity from other life. She writes:

โ€œIf one understands that the beginning of a life during pregnancy may be equated with a human life only if one defines humanity, or what it means to be human, in strictly biological terms, it becomes obvious that, if being human means something in addition to, something more than or different from, being a member of a certain biological species, the answer to the question of when life begins places the problem of abortion on the level with that of animal slaughter.โ€

She continues, โ€œThe life of an animal organism, obviously, begins at conception. But human life begins only at the moment that the animal has a mind. In some very fast developers, this can happen before the age of one year; in a large majority of cases, this happens between two and three years of age.โ€

While it is not only important but necessary to consider the concerns of parents opting for IVF and the views of others from a cultural perspective, they should not be the immediate priority. The issues warranting address initially are those regarding the embryos themselvesโ€“before prioritizing consideration to those ancillary or downstream. Pertinent issues should be examined, but not at the expense of what the Alabama Supreme Court already calls children.

If the bedrock issues are about life and rights attendant to it, societal decisions and their implementation must not be a function of economics (how much money will be lost/gained) or democracy (how many people think embryos are alive and deserve Constitutional protection as human beings).

To treat the issues surrounding the humanity of embryos otherwise is to disregard, trivialize that for which so many before us have given the last full measure of their humanityโ€“our rights under the Constitution. The Bill of Rights does not come from the people and is not subject to change by majorities. It comes from the nature of things. It declares the inalienable rights of man not only against all government but also against the people collectively. โ€“Walter Lippmann

F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr.
F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. is a retired USAF Lt. Col. and retired university professor of the Humanities, Philosophy of Religion and Philosophy. His education includes a PhD in philosophy from Univ. of Wales, two masters degrees (MTh-Texas Christian Univ.), (MA-Univ. South Africa) and an abiding passion for what is in America's best interest.

Was Texas Storm Manmade?

Another โ€œ1-in-100 yearsโ€ weather event in Kerr County happened next to a Texas designated โ€œWeather Modification Map of Rain-Enhancement Projects in Texasโ€.

The America Party Will Harm Democrats The Most

Elon Musk formed the America Party after an X poll asking his followers if they wanted โ€œindependence from the two-party system!

Democrats Exhibit the Dunning-Kruger Effect (DKE)

โ€œThe Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias where people with low ability at a task overestimate their competence, while those with high ability underestimate their competence.

250 Countdown

Those 56 intrepid men who signed put their very lives, honor and fortunes on the line. There was no auto-quill to accommodate their signatures.ย 

How the Senate Parliamentarian Changed the OBBB

An unelected bureaucrat does a important job in the U.S. Senate. Elizabeth MacDonough enforces senate rules on Trumpโ€™s โ€œOne Big Beautiful Billโ€.

Trial Begins Over Trump Adminโ€™s Deportations of Pro-Palestinian Students

A trial over President Trumpโ€™s attempts to deport pro-Palestinian activists began on July 7 with attorneys debating free speech.

Man Killed After Opening Fire at Border Patrol Facility in Texas

27-year-old man armed with a rifle was killed after opening fire outside Border Patrol facility in McAllen, TX, prompting shootout with feds and local police.

California Rejects Federal Push to End Transgender Participation in School Sports

CA education officials are refusing to end policies allowing transgender students to participate in school sports consistent with their gender identities.

Amazon Prime Day Set to Lift US Online Sales by $23.8 Billion

Online spending in the United States is expected to surge by $23.8 billion during Amazonโ€™s expanded Prime Day event from July 8 to July 11.

Trump to Extend Tariff Deadline to Aug. 1, Keep Rates at 10 Percent During Talks

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump will sign the order to move the deadline to Aug. 1 from its current date of July 9.

DOJ, FBI Find Epstein Committed Suicide, Had No โ€˜Client Listโ€™

Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide and had no โ€œclient list,โ€ according to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI.

National Weather Service Fully Staffed During Deadly Texas Flooding: White House

White House press sec. Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the National Weather Service had a full staff on hand to handle the Central Texas flooding.

US Removes Terrorist Designation for Al Qaeda Affiliate in Syria

The State Department has removed from its list of foreign terrorist organizations Al Qaedaโ€™s affiliate in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra.
spot_img

Related Articles