Trump’s $454m Fraud Case Overturned on Appeal Soon?

Once again the mainstream (fake news) media is guilty of both journalism malpractice and election interference. Last week some really big and good news went down relative to former President Donald Trump’s New York fraud trial. New York State’s Appellate Court delivered a significant victory for President Trump by appearing to be about to overturn the $454 million fraud case brought against him by New York Attorney General Letitia James. This was the woman attorney who ran her campaign on a promise to “get Trump”.

Podcaster Trish Regan states the Letitia James is now desperately looking for an “off ramp” from this attempt at malicious prosecution and may soon run for New York City mayor.

The court’s pending decision could demonstrate former President Trump’s resilience in the face of what many viewed as politically motivated lawfare and a victory for right over wrong. In a remarkable turn, the AG’s defense team was left pleading in their closing statements, asking the court not to impose sanctions against them. This outcome highlights Trump’s continued strength in navigating legal battles and standing firm against his corrupt opposition.

This past week the Trump legal team went before the appeals court in his civil fraud trial with AG Letitia James in New York, and the Appeals judges couldn’t understand why James filed this case in the first place. Prosecutors questioned James’ legal team if there has ever been a case on record like this in history. After 6 hours, they had nothing.

They asked her legal team for examples of anyone ever bringing a case like this before, and insinuated it seemed politically motivated. In closing arguments the James team spent a bulk of their time begging not to be sanctioned for weaponizing the New York Justice System.

During the hearing NY state’s attorney Judith Vale, [speaking on behalf of the Trump “supposed” fraud case brought by Letitia James] was grilled by most of the 5 judge panel. Without much opportunity to speak, a judge interjected and inquired about other instances where the attorney general had filed lawsuits under the state executive law:

“to upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners, where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence; where the supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim, through written disclaimers, to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions; where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of properties and businesses; and where the victim never complained about any fraud.”

The situation did not improve for the state after that. Another Appellate Court judge questioned the impact since there was minimal to no effect on the public marketplace. A third judge described the case as a possible disagreement between private parties, implying that it did not require the involvement of the attorney general. Finally, a fourth judge on the panel expressed concerns about mission creep, highlighting whether the state law had been utilized for purposes beyond its original intent even suggesting they were going after a person for political purposes.

Based on preliminary oral arguments it appears the Trump Fraud case is about to be overturned at the Appellate level. By the end of this proceeding the attorneys working for Letitia James were begging the Appeals Court not to impose sanctions on Letitia James and co-councils during their closing arguments.

One legal expert stated Letitia James should have never stuck her nose in something that was none of her business and no doubt beyond her mental comprehension to understand (New York real estate); a private business transaction between the Trump Organization and Deutsche Bank where business concluded, loans were paid off on-time with interest, and both parties were satisfied.

CONCLUSION:

In case you were wondering what lawyer sanctions were all about, like we were, Wikipedia had this to say about “sanctions”:

“Within the context of civil law, sanctions are usually monetary fines which are levied against a party to a lawsuit or to their attorney for violating rules of procedure, or for abusing the judicial process.”

Members of the DOJ who aided in the prosecution of this case must be investigated. James should be disbarred and indicted for abuse of power and election interference. The millions of dollars that Trump paid in legal fees should be reimbursed with interest.

Most of us are not lawyers but, unlike the lawyers and Judge Arthur Engoron of this story, we do know right from wrong.

The gentleman of this post shared by Elon Musk does a good job of offering an understandable synopsis of this case. His internet handle and channel is ”The Older Millennial (@teameffujoe) · X”.

Copyright © 2024 by Mark S. Schwendau