Kayleigh McEnany Questions Press about Obama and Unmasking Michael Flynn

In the White House Press Briefing on May 22, 2020, Kayleigh McEnany questions press about President Barack Obama and the Unmasking of General Michael Flynn.

Chanel Rio (OAN): Thank you Kayleigh. I’d like to switch gears asking about President Obama. We had a, does the President, we had an interesting article from Joe Polluck this morning and I would like to ask you if the president has considered cardening President Obama for illegally wiretapping on Trump Towers, illegally spying on U.S. citizens and other potential crimes out there. Has he considered that.

Kayleigh McEnany: So I have not spoken to the president about that, but who I did speak to about President Obama and unmasking Michel Flynn where the men and women in this room. I haven’t spoken to him on that specific point, have spoken about the matter generally, and I laid out a series of questions that any good journalist would want to answer about why people were unmasked and all sorts of questions, and I just wanted to and follow up with you guys on that. Did anyone take it upon themselves to pose any questions about Michael Flynn and unmasking to President Obama spokesperson? Oh, not a single journalist has posed that questions. Okay, so I would like to lay out a series of questions, and perhaps if I write them out in a slide format, maybe we’re visual learners, and you guys will follow up with journalistic curiosity.

So, Number One, Why did the Obama Administration use opposition, opposition research funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt to surveil members of the Trump campaign

Number Two, Why was Lt. General Michael Flynn unmasked, not by the Intel community entirely, but by Obama’s Chief of Staff, by the former Vice President Joe Biden, by Susan Rice, by the treasury secretary. I mean, this is extraordinary and, you know, it this were political appointees in the Trump Administration, I can guarantee you I have questions in my inbox right now. But apparently Obama’s spokesperson does not. Number Three, Why was Flynn’s identity leaked in a criminal act. It is a criminal act to leak the identity of Michael Flynn to the press, but it happened. Where are the questions to Obama’s spokesperson, because my team would be running around this building should this have happened under the Trump Administration. Number Four, Why did the DOJ, Sally Yates learn about the unmasking from President Obama? So much for going by-the-book as Susan Rice said three times. Though doth protest too much, Susan Rice!

And then finally question Number Five, Why did James Clapper, John Brennen, Samantha Powers and Susan Rice privately admit under oath they had no evidence of collusion, while saying the opposite publicly.

It’s a long weekend. You guys have three days to follow up on those questions, and I certainly hope the next time I ask, some hands go up, because Barack Obama’s spokesperson should be asked those questions, because President Trump spokespeople certainly would be.

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

Are Liberal Democrats Faking Things These Days?

The โ€œFighting Oligarchyโ€ rally in Nampa, Idaho has even AI applications confirming suspicions the video of AOC and her new bogus accent are doctored.

Congress Is Looking at Medicaidโ€”What to Know

Medicaid serves nearly a quarter of the U.S. population,...

Ukraineโ€™s Extension of Martial Law Exposes Zelenskyโ€™s Fear of Losing Re-Election

Ukraine extended martial law exposing Zelensky's fear of losing re-election. Heโ€™s very unpopular, and he likely fears that the US wants to replace him.

Trumpโ€™s Tariffs Aren’t What You Think

Trump's tariffs are misunderstood โ€“ they are in fact part of a larger, more involved scheme which could reset America's global economic relations.

An Easter Basket of Deplorables

The Easter Bunny, a fantastical creature, is incapable of compassion, tolerance, and hope. Democrats, on the other hand, espouse but do not practice them.

News

Police at Jan. 6 Capitol Rally Ask Supreme Court to Protect Identities in Dispute

Four current and former Seattle police officers who attended Jan. 6 capitol rally ask Supreme Court to protect their identities in dispute.

Trump Pushes for Rate Cut, Says Powellโ€™s โ€˜Termination Cannot Come Fast Enoughโ€™

President Trump renewed his call for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, saying Fed Chair Jerome Powellโ€™s โ€œtermination cannot come fast enough.โ€

Treasury Department Sanctions Chinese Refinery Accused of Buying More Than $1 Billion Worth of Iranian Oil

Trump's Treasury Dept sanctioned China-based refinery purchasing billion worth of Iranian oil as part of โ€œcampaign of maximum economic pressureโ€ on Tehran.

Google Violated Antitrust Law With Ad Tech Business, Court Rules

Federal judge ruled Google violated antitrust law in its ad technology practices, marking major loss and potential large-scale changes to its business.

Congress Is Looking at Medicaidโ€”What to Know

Medicaid serves nearly a quarter of the U.S. population,...

Judge Rules DOJ Can Pause Funding Legal Guidance for Illegal Immigrants Facing Deportation

DOJ can temporarily stop funding programs that provide legal orientation for illegal immigrants, including those detained by ICE.

Bondi Says Mistakenly Deported El Salvador Man Not Coming Back

AG Pam Bondi said that Kilmar Abrego Garcia will not be returning to the U.S., and El Salvador President Bukele said he was not sending him back.

Judge Boasberg Finds Probable Cause to Hold Trump Admin in Contempt in Deportations Case

Judge Boasberg issued opinion stating heโ€™s found probable cause Trump admin was in criminal contempt by refusing to comply with order prohibiting deportations.
spot_img

Related Articles