Biden’s Impossible Tax Increase

5Mind. The Meme Platform
The Epoch Times Header

I am writing this on April Fool’s Day. That may be the perfect day to try to explain how impossible, and indeed foolish, the newest Joe Biden tax proposal is.

President Biden is proposing a tax on wealth appreciation for people above a certain level of wealth. In that group, if you have a house and the value goes up, you would pay a tax on the appreciation. If you had stock, you would pay tax on the increase. If you owned a privately held company that had a good year, you would pay a tax on the increase. If you had a farm, and the value of the land and equipment and buildings appreciated, you would pay a tax.

Of course, the first question you have to ask about this new tax is: Why you think it would remain restricted to a small group of wealthy people? Government and pro-government politicians have a never-ending need for more money. They would immediately start targeting the next lowest threshold to shake down.

History is filled with examples of a tax starting small and steadily growing. When the income tax was passed in 1894, it was supposed to apply to only the highest 10 percent of income earners. Naturally, over the years, that was extended to almost everyone. The Biden wealth tax would rapidly face the same kind of expansion. Within a few years, virtually everyone who owned any property, stocks, or businesses would face a complicated system of paying taxes on an increase in wealth—even if you did not have any increase in income.

There are three even bigger problems with this kind of wealth tax.

First, who is going to measure your assets every year? Are you going to have an IRS agent pouring over all your assets (including your home) and then telling you what you are worth in his or her opinion? As the government needs more money, it will simply extend the number of things that count toward your assessed wealth. They’ll open up furniture, paintings, jewelry, family heirlooms, your car—the list will only grow? Imagine the level of paperwork—and the frequency of appeals to a reviewing authority—this will lead to. (Of course, this activity will only give government an excuse to expand and create new bureaucracies.)

Second, if you don’t have enough income to pay the wealth tax, will the government force you to seek assets to meet this new obligation—including the assets it just assessed? Does that represent a taking of your property?

Third, what about the years when you lose wealth? Imagine the mess after the 2008–2009 financial crisis, when the price of housing dropped dramatically—or the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on many businesses. Knowing government and liberal politicians who are desperate for money, this will be a one-way street. If you succeed, you pay. If you lose, you get no relief.

If you look at the Biden budget proposal, you will see why they are desperate for more money from the American people.

By Newt Gingrich

Read Full Article on TheEpochTimes.com

Contact Your Elected Officials
The Epoch Times
The Epoch Timeshttps://www.theepochtimes.com/
Tired of biased news? The Epoch Times is truthful, factual news that other media outlets don't report. No spin. No agenda. Just honest journalism like it used to be.

Post-Epstein Document Dump: The Moment for Left-Right Populist Unity?

Claims that a powerful, lawless network of child abusers has captured major Western institutions are now asserted with unprecedented certainty.

When care leads to death

On December 12, Illinois legalize physician assisted suicide, rebranded under the soothing sounding banner of “medical aid in dying,” or MAID.

Two Big Game Halftime Show Options

During the Super Bowl this year there will be two halftime shows going on at the same time competing for viewers.

‘Fantasizing About the Caribbean Island’: A Leftist Demigod’s Epic Fall From Grace

I forever washed my hands of Noam Chomsky when he demanded that the unvaccinated be “isolated from society.”

Pride and Prejudice and the Modern Woman: What the Story Should Still Mean to Us Today

Why should Jane Austin's Pride and Prejudice be so influential? Because it upholds biblical precepts pertaining to purity, manhood and womanhood.

‘All-American Halftime Show’ Serves as Alternative to Super Bowl’s Bad Bunny, Green Day Performance

Dueling halftime performances will vie for the attention of viewers across the world at Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, California, on Sunday night.

Pentagon to Cut Academic Ties With Harvard, Hegseth Says

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said the Pentagon will cut all academic ties with Harvard, saying the university no longer meets military services needs.

Appeals Court Rejects Challenge to Trump’s Orders Curbing DEI

A federal appeals court turned away a challenge to President Trump’s EO ending so-called DEI programs in the federal government.

Nearly 2,000 Truckers Deemed Unfit Are Removed From American Roads

Nearly 2,000 truckers deemed unqualified to drive on U.S. roads have been removed, with arrests made and many vehicles placed out of service, DOT said.

Why Canada’s China Pivot Makes US Tariff Relief Harder

Analysts say Ottawa’s Beijing outreach is raising new security and trade concerns in Washington—making U.S. tariff relief even harder to secure.

Trump Lifts Biden-Era Restrictions on Commercial Fishing in Atlantic Marine Monument

President Trump revoked a prohibition on commercial fishing in the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument.

US Unveils Interim Trade Framework With India, Drops Punitive Tariff

“The Interim trade framework between the US and India will represent a historic milestone in our countries’ partnership" countries said in a joint statement.

Trump Says He’s Still Looking ‘Seriously’ at Sending $2,000 Tariff Rebate Payments

Trump said in an interview that his administration is still considering sending out $2,000 payments to Americans derived from his tariffs.
spot_img

Related Articles