Committee To Unleash Prosperity: A Brief History of the Policies of Equitable Prosperity

Committee To Unleash Prosperity

The phrase โ€œSupply-Side economicsโ€ was first coined by Jude Wanniski.

Polyconomicsโ€™ chief economist Alan Reynolds flagged the phrase โ€œSupply-Side fiscalistsโ€ from Republican economist Herb Stein, from which Wanniski clipped away โ€œfiscalists.โ€ The policies to which it referred were made relevant and compelling by political heroes, most prominently Rep. Jack Kemp (R-NY) and President Ronald Reagan.

In the late 1970s America was beset by a staggering โ€œMisery Index,โ€ meaning high inflation accompanied by high unemployment which, per the prevailing Neo-Keynesian economic doctrine, was an impossibility. โ€œSupply-Sideโ€ contained an allusion to Sayโ€™s Law, named for free market economist Jean-Baptiste Say: โ€œSupply creates its own demand.โ€

Supply-Side is a species of free market economics, among whose variants a great deal of intramural skirmishing occurs.

Supply-Side differentiates from libertarian, Austrian, laissez faire and classical liberalism, generally not in substance but in emphasis.

Supply-Side emphasizes the prosperity-generating quality of free markets.

The โ€œCreatorsโ€ or โ€œProducersโ€ of goods and services โ€” entrepreneurs, businesses, investorsโ€”are the key driver of the economy, rather than the prevailing Neo-Keynesian emphasis on the consumer, known in the economistโ€™s jargon as โ€œaggregate demand.โ€ Supply-Side economics is about empowering new or greater production, rather than consumption. All consumption, or โ€œspending,โ€ is the result of oneโ€™s production because one cannot consume, or spend money, without first producing (e.g. by working or investing).

Supply-Side is rooted in counsels of generosity and benevolence and its policies have historically been either neutral between capital and labor, creditors and debtors or, more often, leaned toward moderately privileging labor and debtors over capital and creditors. It is no coincidence that the two great political progenitors of Supply-Side economics, Rep. Jack Kemp and President Ronald Reagan had been presidents of labor unions before going on to political greatness. Supply-Side indicts misers and exalts benefactors.

To resolve the persistent economic misery besetting America and the world-pioneering economic visionaries Prof. Robert Mundell, who later received the Nobel Prize in economics for his work on optimal currency areas, and Dr. Arthur B. Laffer, who later received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Donald Trump, proposed to invert the conventional policy prescription of easy money and high marginal tax rates.

The new economic policy doctrine was set forth in the charter document of Supply-Side Economics, The Mundell-Laffer Hypothesis by Jude Wanniski, and Arthur Laffer, published in The Public Interest in the Spring 1975 issue.

The essence of their proposition, contained at page 49, was:

Since 1961, Mundell has argued that monetary and fiscal policies are totally distinct policy instruments that can be employed for separate purposes and even utilized in opposing directions.

Monetary policy is the appropriate instrument to maintain external balance; fiscal policy is the appropriate instrument to maintain external balance; fiscal policy is the appropriate instrument to maintain aggregate demand and internal balance. If the world economy has inflation and unemployment at the same time, the proper policy mix is tight money and fiscal ease. The latter should preferably take the form of tax reductions although Mundell agrees that government purchases of good (sic) and services will also have beneficial effects.

The vast bulk of this, the Supply-Sideโ€™s charter document, was devoted to monetary stability, fixed exchange rates, referencing, without quite prescribing, the classical gold standard. As a secondary matter it addressed the excessive marginal income tax rates โ€“ as nominally high as 70% for investment income โ€” into which inflation had ambushed even the members of the middle class.

Footnote four of this article was devoted to what became known as the Laffer Curve, which came to the fore in the political discourse. Wanniski went on to add: โ€œLaffer, who took the insight from his friend Mundell and refined it to embrace the effects of transfer payments, also argued the case in a memorandum to Treasury Secretary Simonโ€:

The best program to combat inflation simultaneously reduces money growth and increases real output growth. In order to increase real output growth, it is first necessary to focus

on why people, machines, land, and other factors of production choose to be employed. Secondly, it is necessary to focus on why firms choose to employ these productive factors. It is taken here as a simple truth that in part productive factorsโ€™ choice to work is based upon their ability to earn after-tax income. It is likewise taken as a virtually obvious proposition that the more an employer has to pay his factors of production the less he will want. Marginal taxes of all sorts stand as a wedge between what an employer pays his factors of production and what they ultimately receive in after-tax income.

The Mundell-Laffer Hypothesis challenged both the conservative conventional wisdom of โ€œmonetary and fiscal restraintโ€ (i.e. tight money and high tax rates) to fight inflation and the liberal conventional wisdom of โ€œmonetary and fiscal easeโ€ (i.e. easy money and lower tax rates) to combat recession. This heterodox proposition, violating the dogmas of both the right and left, was ridiculed and derided

by the Establishment. It was called by George H.W. Bush โ€œVoodoo Economicsโ€ for its claim, among other things, that by cutting punitively high (e.g. 70%) marginal tax rates one could grow the tax base and thereby, over time, increase tax revenues. While it seemed counterintuitive that one could increase tax revenue by cutting rates it turned out to be correct.

And common sense. A government that taxes too heavily is akin to a company that charges prohibitive prices for its products. People will stop buying what is priced above its value and its purveyorโ€™s revenue will wither. Or, as the oldest book of political and moral philosophy in the world, the Tao Te Ching, states:

Why are the people starving?

Because the rulers use up the money in taxes. Therefore the people are starving.

Why are the people rebellious? Because the rulers interfere too much. Therefore they are rebellious.

Notwithstanding the attendant establishment ridicule, presidential candidate Ronald Reagan embraced the Supply-Side policy formulation. In the process Reagan gained the presidential campaign endorsement of Rep. Kemp and the support of the Supply-Side โ€œcabal.โ€ And went on to beat the incumbent Jimmy Carter.

On the day in November 1979 that Reagan formally announced his presidential candidacy, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stood at 814. US real GDP was slightly below $2.9T.

The stable money policies called for by Mundell and Laffer were adopted by Fed Chairman Paul Volcker with Reaganโ€™s political support.

The marginal rate cuts called for by Kemp, emulating Kennedy, under the guidance of, among others, Mundell and Laffer, Congress enacted the Kemp-Roth 30%-across-the board marginal tax rate cut (diluted in practice to 24%, and phased in rather than immediately adopted). Beneficially, Democratic officials in the Congress led the dropping of the top tax rate from 70% to 50%, and, then, again led by Democrats, to 28%.

Committee senior fellow Ralph Benko founded and led, followed by committee chairman Stephen Moore, the Prosperity Caucus in the 1980s and following years. Originally called โ€œthe gathering of the Supply-Side tribesโ€ it was designed to coordinate the various free market policy thinkers and minimize factionalism. The group, still meeting regularly today, was thereafter led by Jim Lucier, Bob Stein, James Carter and Ike Bannon. Jonathan Decker, executive director of the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, currently is the chief organizer of the Supply-Side Capitalist Leagueโ€™s youth group and its monthly gathering..

President Bill Clinton later raised the top rate to 39.6%, much to the dismay of Supply-Siders. Dismay aside, such a raise did not prevent real GDP growth from growing at a real 4% rate. To his credit (and with due credit to the mercurial and entrepreneurial House Speaker Newt Gingrich in pushing these reforms), Clinton adopted the Supply-Side policies of welfare reform and cutting the capital gains tax rate. The good achieved by such policy innovations more than offset the damage done by raising the top marginal rate.

Over time, US GDP grew from $2.9T to about $20T in 2018. Meanwhile, with much of the world having adopted something very like the Supply-Side formula, world GDP rose from $11T in 1979 to $88T today.

Some Voodoo!

The Committeeโ€™s analysis concludes that there are five major factors needed to โ€œunleash prosperityโ€ and thereby, achieve โ€œuniversal opulence.โ€

The Mission of the Committee To Unleash Prosperity

Over the nearly 70 years since World War II, the U.S. economy has grown by nearly 3 ยฝ percent annually, adjusted for inflation. However over the past decade and a half under Republican and Democratic presidents, and Republican and Democratic Congresses, U.S. growth has sputtered to around 2%. This growth slump has damaged investment, employment, incomes, poverty, social mobility, family life, and above all lack of growth has damaged the American dream of opportunity for all. The great American idea that you can come from humble background and rise to the top has been undermined. And finally, as President Ronald Reagan taught us โ€œweakness at home leads to weakness abroadโ€. Unfortunately, American international leadership and influence has suffered in recent years proving the President Reaganโ€™s analysis was completely correct.

The Committee To Unleash Prosperity mission:

We want to turn America around and restore American exceptionalism.

We want provide new hope, growth and opportunity for everyone.

We believe this is the great challenge of our time.

Therefore in pursuit of rapid growth, we support the following principles:

  1. Broad-based, low rate, flat tax
  2. Limited government spending
  3. Lite regulation
  4. Sound money
  5. Free trade
  6. Rule of Constitutional law

Those are our building blocks to restore American prosperity and greatness!

Committee To Unleash Prosperity

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

Made-in-America Entrepreneurs See Opportunities in Global Tariffs

Itโ€™s more than just a label. โ€œMade in Americaโ€ represents pride and the national spirit, says John Roy, CEO of Dawson Knives in Prescott, Arizona.

Easterโ€™s Christian hunt

Easter isn't another benevolent Sunday. It's the holy remembrance of the salvific victory Jesus Christ had over death and is the defining moment in human history.ย 

The 9-11 Commission Report to Be Revisited?

Trump Admin should reopen an investigation of events of 9/11 as it appears it was a criminal act to conceal theft of trillions of taxpayer dollars!

Legal Battles, Accusations of Bias as Americaโ€™s Public Media Faces Uncertain Future

Voice of America says it shares a message of freedom and hope, while the Trump administration calls it โ€˜radical propaganda.โ€™

Are Liberal Democrats Faking Things These Days?

The โ€œFighting Oligarchyโ€ rally in Nampa, Idaho has even AI applications confirming suspicions the video of AOC and her new bogus accent are doctored.

News

Fed Approves Capital Oneโ€“Discover Merger to Create 8th Largest US Bank

The Federal Reserve Board has given its approval for Capital One Financial Corporationโ€™s merger with Discover Financial Services in a $35.3 billion deal.

Education Department Asks Harvard for Foreign Fundersโ€™ List After University Submits Inaccurate Records

Dept of Ed sent โ€œrecords requestโ€ to Harvard Univ after review of institutionโ€™s reports found foreign funding disclosures were โ€œincomplete and inaccurate.โ€

Supreme Court Blocks Deportation of Alleged Venezuelan Gang Members for Now

Supreme Court temporarily blocked Trump admin from deporting Venezuelan men currently in immigration custody who are alleged to be criminal gang members.

Appeals Court Halts Judge Boasbergโ€™s Contempt Order in Deportations Case

Appeals court temporarily halted Boasbergโ€™s order finding probable cause Trump admin was in contempt for not complying with order prohibiting deportations.

Judge Blocks Trumpโ€™s Order Ending โ€˜Xโ€™ Gender Marker on Passports

A federal judge ruled against the Trump adminโ€™s EO banning the use of an โ€œXโ€ on passports marked by people self-identifying as neither male nor female.

ACLU Seeks Immediate Stay From Supreme Court of Deportation of Alleged Gang Members

ACLU filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to immediately block the Trump administration from deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members.

What to Know About the Florida State University Campus Shooting

Florida State Univ became a deadly crime scene as a student opened fire, killing two and injuring six others before he was shot and apprehended by law enforcement.

Judge Bars Trump Admin From Deporting Illegal Immigrants to Third Countries Without Warning or Torture Review

Federal judge barred Trump admin from deporting illegal immigrants with final removal orders to countries they would face persecution, torture, or death.
spot_img

Related Articles