Dying of Money: Lessons of the Great German and American Inflations

The cover motif is a piece of old German money. It is a Reichsbanknote issued on August 22, 1923 for one hundred million marks. Nine years earlier, that many marks would have been about 5 percent of all the German marks in the world, worth 23 million American dollars. On the day it was issued, it was worth about twenty dollars. Three months later, it was worth only a few thousandths of an American cent. The process by which this occurs is known as inflation.

A few years before, in 1920 and 1921, Germany had enjoyed a remarkable prosperity envied by the rest of the world. Prices were steady, business was humming, everyone was working, the stock market was skyrocketing. The Germans were swimming in easy money. Within the year, they were drowning in it. Until it was all over, no one seemed to notice any connection between the earlier false boom and the later inflationary bust.

In this book, Jens O. Parsson performs the neat trick of transforming the dry economic subject of inflation into a white-knuckles kind of blood-chiller. He begins with a freewheeling account of the spectacular inflation that all but destroyed Germany in 1923, taking it apart to find out both what made it tick and what made it finally end. He goes on to look at the American inflation that was steadily gaining force after 1962. In terms clear and fascinating enough for any layman, but with technical validity enough for any economist, he applies the lessons gleaned from the German inflation to find that too much about the American inflation was the same, lacking only the inexorable further deterioration that time would bring. The book concludes by charting out all the possible future prognoses for the American inflation, none easy but some much less catastrophic than others.

Mr. Parsson brings much new light to bear on this subject. He lays on the line in tough, spare language exactly how and why the American inflation was caused, exactly who was responsible for causing it, exactly who unjustly benefited and who suffered from the inflation, exactly why the government could not permit the inflation to stop or even to cease growing worse, exactly who was going to pay the ultimate price, and exactly what would have to be done to avert the ultimate conclusion.

This book packs a wallop. It is not for the timid, and it spares no tender sensibilities. The conclusions it reaches are shocking and are bound to provoke endless dispute. If they proved to approximate even remotely the correct analysis of the American inflation, hardly any American citizen could escape being the prey of inflation and no one could afford not to know where the inflation was taking him. In the economic daily lives of everyone, nothing will be the same after this book as it was before.

Review

Over the past 4 years I’ve made the study of finance, economics, geo-politics, money and taxation my journey. In doing so I’ve read countless white papers, comment and around 140 books on the varying subjects, all in an effort to understand ‘what is going on’. In an effort to understand the current tertiary teachings, I’ve also succesfully obtained the CFP (Certified Financial Planner) qualification. And I’ve found they teach so much incorrectly, especially inflation, its causes and effects.

If I was ever restricted to owning one book, and that one book was to provide the most amount of understanding of a subject, ‘Dying of Money’ would be that book. I managed to obtain a copy some 18 months ago, and I consider it the pearl of my book collection.

It is well-written, concise, clear, and everytime I’ve read the book (6 times to date) I’ve managed to find a new understanding of the subject. Personally I believe that this book should be reprinted and should be made a set-work for secondary school scholars.

Own it. It really is that good.

D. Morris

About the Author

Ronald H. Marcks (Jens O. Parsson) wrote “Dying of Money” in 1974, at the height of the double-digit inflation then raging, analyzing its causes and accurately predicting its future. His analysis of the financing gap in Social Security was published in the Wall Street Journal in the 1980โ€™s. He self-published the book using under the pen name Jens O Parsson and used Wellspring Press as the name of the publisher.  He sold just a thousand or so copies fulfilling them himself.

A former Navy pilot, Ron graduated from Dartmouth College (Phi Beta Kappa) in 1952 and Harvard Law School in 1960.  He was a partner in the Boston, MA, law firm Goodwin, Procter & Hoar, then became General Counsel at Norton Company in Worcester, MA. Ron decided to use a pen-name when he wrote “Dying of Money” because he felt, at the time, that his theories were radical enough to offend either people at his law firm or their clients or both.

Through the years he has participated in numerous business and philanthropic organizations, including his local conservation commission.  He gave a number of talks about the economy to civic organizations.  Retired, he and his wife live in suburban Boston, enjoying opera, theater, family and outdoor activities, and his interest in economic matters.

Read More About Dying of Money

Dying-of-Money-Edited

Book Knowledge
Book Knowledgehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/previews/books-magazines/
Book Knowledge shares books, magazines and other sources that help us grow in our knowledge of conservatism and help us make a difference in our country.

Columns

Legal Battles, Accusations of Bias as Americaโ€™s Public Media Faces Uncertain Future

Voice of America says it shares a message of freedom and hope, while the Trump administration calls it โ€˜radical propaganda.โ€™

Are Liberal Democrats Faking Things These Days?

The โ€œFighting Oligarchyโ€ rally in Nampa, Idaho has even AI applications confirming suspicions the video of AOC and her new bogus accent are doctored.

Congress Is Looking at Medicaidโ€”What to Know

Medicaid serves nearly a quarter of the U.S. population,...

Ukraineโ€™s Extension of Martial Law Exposes Zelenskyโ€™s Fear of Losing Re-Election

Ukraine extended martial law exposing Zelensky's fear of losing re-election. Heโ€™s very unpopular, and he likely fears that the US wants to replace him.

Trumpโ€™s Tariffs Aren’t What You Think

Trump's tariffs are misunderstood โ€“ they are in fact part of a larger, more involved scheme which could reset America's global economic relations.

News

Trump Admin Accuses New York Attorney General of Possible Mortgage Fraud

Trump administration referred NY AG Letitia James to the DOJ for possible criminal charges in connection with alleged mortgage fraud.

Appeals Court Denies Trump Adminโ€™s Request to Intervene in Case of Man Deported to El Salvador

Court of Appeals denied Trump adminโ€™s request to block federal judgeโ€™s orders, one of which is to facilitate return of illegal immigrant from El Salvador.

6 Hospitalized After Shooting at Florida State University

After reporting active shooter on campus and locking down, emergency alert system for FSU announced law enforcement โ€œneutralized the threat.โ€

Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Challenge to Trumpโ€™s Birthright Citizenship Order

Supreme Court left in place lower court orders blocking Trumpโ€™s policy of limiting birthright citizenship for certain individuals and scheduled oral argument for next month.

Multiple Victims After Active Shooter Reported at Florida State University

Police responded to an active shooter report on the campus of Florida State University (FSU) on April 17, with multiple people hospitalized.

Police at Jan. 6 Capitol Rally Ask Supreme Court to Protect Identities in Dispute

Four current and former Seattle police officers who attended Jan. 6 capitol rally ask Supreme Court to protect their identities in dispute.

Trump Pushes for Rate Cut, Says Powellโ€™s โ€˜Termination Cannot Come Fast Enoughโ€™

President Trump renewed his call for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, saying Fed Chair Jerome Powellโ€™s โ€œtermination cannot come fast enough.โ€

Google Violated Antitrust Law With Ad Tech Business, Court Rules

Federal judge ruled Google violated antitrust law in its ad technology practices, marking major loss and potential large-scale changes to its business.
spot_img

Related Articles