Fact Check: False. CNN’s Bash Questions Trump Lawyer After Trump Lashes Out at Special Counsel

Rise Up 'Deplorables': Rallying Round Pro-America Businesses
The Article III Project

1. On April 2, 2022, Biden aides selectively leaked to The New York Times that Biden was frustrated with Garland for not indicting Trump: “The attorney general’s deliberative approach has come to frustrate Democratic allies of the White House and, at times, President Biden himself. As recently as late last year, Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J. Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted, according to two people familiar with his comments. And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6.” https://nytimes.com/2022/04/02/us/politics/merrick-garland-biden-trump.html…

2. On April 11, 2022, Jonathan Su, deputy White House counsel to President Biden, relayed to the National Archives that Biden waived Trump’s claim of Executive Privilege, leading to the unprecedented raid on a former president last August and the June indictment by Garland and his special counsel Jack Smith for the non-crime of a former president having his presidential records–which Trump’s allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/biden-white-house-facilitated-dojs-criminal-probe-against-trump…

3. On November 9, 2022, Biden said this: “Well, we just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by — if we — if he does run.  I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.” https://whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/11/09/remarks-by-president-biden-in-press-conference-8/…

4. On November 18, 2022, Garland appointed disgraced former federal prosecutor Jack Smith, who was unanimously reversed and rebuked by the Supreme Court for his political prosecution of a likely 2016 Republican presidential contender, to pursue Biden’s leading presidential rival. https://justice.gov/d9/press-releases/attachments/2022/11/18/2022.11.18_order_5559-2022.pdf…

5. Garland personally approved both of Jack Smith’s unprecedented indictments of Trump, for the non-crimes of: (a) a former president having his presidential records, which is allowed by the Presidential Records Act; and (b) a presidential candidate objecting to the presidential election, which is allowed by the Electoral Count Act of 1887 and the First Amendment. But, besides that . . .

Contact Your Elected Officials