Grassley Presses Biden White House for Information, Accountability on So-Called “Court Reform” Commission

WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) wrote to White House Counsel Dana Remus regarding reports of the formation of a ‘bipartisan commission’ to develop policies to reform the Supreme Court and federal judiciary. 

Grassley, who is returning as Ranking Member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, pushed for answers on why the commission was reportedly formed under the auspices of the White House Counsel’s Office, potentially shielding it from transparency laws and public accountability.  

Last fall, as congressional Democrats threatened their desire to pack the Supreme Court, then-candidate Biden ducked questions about his views on the controversial plan. Reports about the commission renew concerns that the Biden administration’s agenda for a separate branch of government could be shrouded in as much secrecy as Biden’s position on the matter during his election campaign. 

If evading public scrutiny was not the intent of this structure, the senator is seeking a commitment from the White House that they make all records generated by the commission publicly available, unredacted, in a timely manner. 

Full text of the letter follows and a PDF of the letter can be found below the text:

February 4, 2021  

Ms. Dana Remus
Counsel to the President
The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,
N.W.Washington, D.C. 20002

Dear Ms. Remus:

According to Politico, President Biden is constituting “a bipartisan commission to study reforms to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary.”[1]  This idea was first floated by President Biden during his campaign, when he said he would task it to present “recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it’s getting out of whack, the way in which it’s being handled.”[2]  

The Politico article sets forth some details about the “bipartisan commission,” namely that it will supposedly be housed in the White House Counsel’s Office and that one of President Biden’s campaign attorneys, Bob Bauer, will direct its operations.[3]  It also noted that the “bipartisan commission” would likely include between nine and fifteen members and is already rumored to include: (1) Cristina Rodriguez, a former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Obama Department of Justice; (2) Caroline Frederickson, the former president of the left-wing American Constitution Society; and (3) Jack Goldsmith, a prominent critic of President Trump and former Assistant Attorney General in the George W. Bush Department of Justice.[4]  At least one of the aforementioned rumored commission members supports ideological court packing, which is a direct assault on the independent judiciary.[5]

Leaving aside the merits of this “bipartisan commission,” of which I am skeptical, even though I am a longstanding proponent of certain reforms to the federal judiciary, this report presents many troubling questions. 

Chief among those are the extent to which this commission will operate in an open, transparent manner.  If the report is correct that the commission will be housed out of the White House Counsel’s Office, its business would likely be subject to the Presidential Records Act, which will delay any public transparency about the “bipartisan commission’s” activities. The Executive Office of the President is shielded from many important public-transparency laws and I am concerned that any efforts to house this “bipartisan commission” in the White House will therefore shield its work from the public eye. I hope that is not the case. 

I would therefore like responses to the following questions no later than February 15, 2021:

1. Was Politico correct to report that this “bipartisan commission” will be housed in the White House Counsel’s Office?

2. Was this “bipartisan commission” constituted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act?

a. If not, why not?

b. If not, will you agree to have the “bipartisan commission” abide by the public-disclosure rules of the Federal Advisory committee Act, as if it had been so constituted?

3. Was this “bipartisan commission” constituted under the Federal Advisory Committee Act?

4. [f the “bipartisan commission” will be subject to the Presidential Records Act, will you
nevertheless agree to give the public access to all unredacted presidential records generated
by the “bipartisan commission” in a timely manner, notwithstanding the provisions of the
Presidential Records Act?

5. Because this “bipartisan commission” involves the federal judiciary, will you agree to
provide the whole Judiciary Committee regular briefings on its progress?

6. Did you consider housing the “bipartisan commission” in the Department of Justice, where
its activities and findings would be subject to the Freedom of Information Act?

7. Was Politico correct to report that this “bipartisan commission,” housed in the White
House Counsel’s Office, will be headed by former White House Counsel Bob Bauer? If
so, what is his employment status in the Executive Office of the President?

   Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. 

Sincerely,

-30-

2021-02-04-CEG-to-WHCO-Remus_Cout-Reform-Commission

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

More Proof, the Democratic Party is Imploding!

Jason Pizzo, the leading Democrat in the Florida Senate announced his departure from the Democratic Party saying he sees the party as dead in Florida.

American Psychiatric Association vs. MAHA: Shots Fired

When Trump formed the MAHA Commission, the parameters were so reasonable that it was hard to imagine how the biomedical establishment could object.

Evaluating Foreign Affairs’ Warning About The Risks Of An Emboldened & Remilitarized Germany

Foreign Affairs warned earlier this month that an emboldened...

9 Things to Know About UK Supreme Court Ruling on Sex, Gender

Britain’s highest court has ruled that the words “woman” and “sex” refer to “a biological woman and biological sex,” in a landmark decision.

Chinese Exporters Begin to Feel Pain of Tariffs as Containers Stack Up

China’s exporters are scrambling to find domestic buyers for their consumer goods as orders from the U.S. have dried up during an escalating trade war.

News

Judge Blocks Removal of Potential Deportees From Texas District

Federal judge temporarily restrained Trump admin from removing individuals from Southern District of Texas in attempt to deport Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

Former Rep. George Santos Sentenced to More Than 7 Years in Prison

Former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) was sentenced on April 25 to more than 7 years in federal prison on wire fraud and aggravated identity theft charges.

Dozens of House Democrats Seek Answers on DOGE Report

House Dems sent letter to Trump admin seeking answers regarding “whistleblower report” from federal labor board staffer with allegations against DOGE.

FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan Over Obstructing, Kash Patel Says

FBI arrested a Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, circuit judge for allegedly assisting an illegal immigrant in evading arrest, FBI Director Kash Patel said.

Former New Mexico Judge, Wife Arrested Over Alleged Evidence Tampering

Inmate bookingreports released by Doña Ana County Detention Center show Judge Cano and his wife were arrested for evidence tampering.

Judge Blocks Trump Admin Effort to Remove DEI From Public Schools

Before deadline for states to certify DEI programs have ended in public schools, a federal court halted Trump admin’s requirement, siding with NEA teachers’ union.

Trump’s Agenda Faces Pushback Amid Legal Battles

Trump faces onslaught of challenges to his agenda, some reaching the nation’s highest court and could ultimately shape US legal landscape.

Texas Governor Signs ‘Texas DOGE’ Into Law to Cut Regulations, Boost Government Efficiency

Texas Gov. Abbott signed Regulatory Reform and Efficiency Act to streamline govt processes and reduce regulatory burden on businesses and residents.
spot_img

Related Articles