How The Obama Administration Weaponized Surveillance Laws To Target Trump

The drip-drip-drip of newly declassified documents related to the Trump-Russia investigation, together with recent reports that a classified leak against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn might not have come from an unmasking request, leaves little doubt that the Obama administration weaponized federal surveillance laws to target Trump associates and undermine the incoming administration.

The story thus far is complex, but it reveals a disturbing abuse of power by the Obama administration that suggests congressional reform of federal surveillance laws is needed to ensure this never happens again.

The latest declassified document, an email written by former White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice detailing a high-level Oval Office meeting on January 5, 2017, directly implicates then-President Obama and other top officials in the targeting of Flynn, including then-Vice President Joe Biden and fired Federal Bureau of Investigations Director James Comey.

According to Rice’s bizarre email, which she wrote to herself as President Trump was being inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2017, Comey told Obama and Biden he had “some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak,” and that “the level of communication is unusual.” How did Comey know this? Because the FBI had been spying on Flynn as part of a counterintelligence investigation it launched in August 2016.

Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador became national news after someone in the Obama administration illegally leaked to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who revealed in a Jan. 12, 2017, column that Flynn had spoken to Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, 2016.

That touched off an effort by Republicans to find out who leaked to the Post. Last week, responding to a request from Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell released a list of former senior Obama administration officials who requested the unmasking of Flynn between Nov. 30, 2016, and Jan. 12, 2017.

The list was revealing. During those weeks, no fewer than 39 Obama administration officials unmasked Flynn, from senior people like Comey and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, to people who had no conceivable reason or unmasking Flynn, like former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power and Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough. Even Biden was on the list.

The sheer number of unmasking requests for Flynn, combined with a disturbing pattern of deception by former Obama officials about the unmaskings, raises serious questions about why the outgoing Obama administration was targeting Trump’s incoming national security advisor, and whether it did so as a pretext to continue the Trump-Russia collusion probe after Trump took office.

But the dates of the unmasking requests don’t match up with Flynn’s Dec. 29 conversations with the Russian ambassador, which suggests Flynn was identified in an intelligence report that didn’t require the concealment of his identity. On Wednesday, the Washington Post reported that, according to an anonymous former senior U.S. official, “When the FBI circulated [the report], they included Flynn’s name from the beginning,” and that, “There were therefore no requests for the unmasking of that information.”

This report matches with a theory floated over the weekend by National Review Online’s Andrew McCarthy, that Flynn’s call with Kislyak might have been “intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community.”

Others have speculated that Flynn’s identity was not masked because he was the target of a counterintelligence investigation by the FBI, a fact Comey never shared with Trump as he was preparing to take office. Even worse, the counterintelligence investigation continued at a “deep state” level after Trump took office, as the FBI agents involved appear to have concealed the fact of the investigation from Department of Justice leadership.

All of this leaves more questions than answers. But Democrats and the mainstream media are scrambling to dismiss the whole thing by insisting Obama committed no crime in the course of the Trump-Russia investigation, and neither did Biden, and neither did anyone else.

The media even construed Attorney General William Barr’s comments Monday, in which he called the Trump-Russia probe a “grave injustice” that was “unprecedented in U.S. history,” as a dismissal of the “Obamagate” plot to undermine Trump’s presidency, even though Barr appeared to suggest that the Department is looking for potential criminality by Obama administration officials other than Obama and Biden. In other words, nothing to see here folks, move along.

By John Daniel Davidson

Read Full Article on TheFederalist.com

The Thinking Conservative
The Thinking Conservativehttps://www.thethinkingconservative.com/
The goal of THE THINKING CONSERVATIVE is to help us educate ourselves on conservative topics of importance to our freedom and our pursuit of happiness. We do this by sharing conservative opinions on all kinds of subjects, from all types of people, and all kinds of media, in a way that will challenge our perceptions and help us to make educated choices.

Columns

Florida Passes a Bill to Stop Weather Manipulation

Florida State Senate passed a bill “SB 56 Geoengineering and Weather Modification Activities” to ban weather modification in and around state.

The Proxy War – That Wasn’t

Britain, Europe and Biden Admin put us at risk of major conflict over past 3 years with self-serving political agenda and leadership away from geopolitical stability.

 Trump’s Tariffs Will Work Terrific!

It is really odd when globalists and lefties put...

Nationwide Injunctions Place US Waist Deep in the Big Muddy

Judges issuing nationwide injunctions are taking the U.S legal system to the neck-deep water of the big muddy, and those fool judges say, “Push on.” 

Confessions of a Censored Conservative

Trump declared the end to censorship in the fed govt, but it is still happening in the private sector, especially to conservatives. The fight continues.

News

In El Salvador, Locals Proud of Efforts to Lock Up Gangs—Including for US

After decades of civil war and gang violence, many...

Harvard to Borrow $750 Million Amid Federal Funding Uncertainty

The Ivy League school faces heightened scrutiny over its...

Northwestern, Cornell Universities Face Federal Funding Freeze Amid Civil Rights Probes

Trump admin is freezing $1 billion in federal funds at Cornell Univ and $790 million at Northwestern Univ, as they face civil rights investigations.

People Identifying as LGB+ ‘At Higher Risk’ of Self-Harm or Suicide

People identifying as lesbian, gay, or LGB+ are at higher risk of intentional self-harm or suicide than those describing as straight or heterosexuals.

Largest US Egg Producer Cal-Maine Under DOJ Price Investigation

Cal-Maine Foods Inc., nation’s largest egg producer, acknowledged it's being investigated by DOJ’s Antitrust Division over national increase in egg prices.

DHS Revokes Legal Status of People Who Entered the US Using CBP One App

Dept of Homeland Security has revoked the legal status of some who were allowed to enter the U.S. using a phone application set up under the Biden admin.

Judge Orders White House to Restore AP’s Access to Press Pool

Judge ruled Trump’s admin cannot exclude AP from White House press pool, solely based on its refusal to use the name “Gulf of America” instead of Gulf of Mexico.

Maine Sues USDA Over Funds Frozen for Allowing Male Athletes in Female Sports

Maine is suing the USDA over the agency’s decision to block federal funds because the state allows male athletes to compete in female sports
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central