The Great China-American Abyss

Imagine if the United States treated China in the same way it does us?

What if American companies simply ignored Chinese copyrights and patents, and stole Chinese ideas, inventions, and intellectual property, as they pleased and with impunity?

What if the American government targeted Chinese industries by dumping competing American export products at below the cost of production—to bankrupt Chinese competitors and corner their markets?

What would the communist Chinese government do if a huge American spy balloon lazily traversed continental China—sending back to the United States photographic surveillance of Chinese military bases and installations?

How would China react to American stonewalling any explanation, much less refusing to apologize for such an American attack on Chinese sovereignty?

Envision a U.S. high-security virology lab in the Midwest, run by the Pentagon, allowing the escape of an engineered, gain-of-function deadly virus.

Instead of enlisting world cooperation to stop the spread of the virus, the American government would lie that it sprung up from a local bat or wild possum.

Washington would then make all its relevant military scientists disappear who were assigned to the lab, while ordering a complete media blackout.

America would forbid Chinese scientists from contacting their American counterparts involved in the lab, despite the deaths of more than 1 million Chinese from the American-manufactured disease.

And what if during the first days of the pandemic Washington had quietly prevented all foreign travel to the United States, while keeping open one-way direct flights from America to major Chinese cities?

How would Beijing respond if American biotech company warehouses were discovered in rural China with unsecured vials of deadly viruses and pathogens?

Would China be angered that it was never notified by an American company that it had left abandoned COVID and HIV viruses and malaria parasites in its facilities—along with rotting genetically engineered dead rats littering the floors with hundreds more lab animals abandoned in laboratory cages?

What would Chairman Xi Jinping have done if American-made fentanyl was shipped in massive quantities to nearby Tibet on the Chinese border? And what if it would be deliberately repackaged there as deceptive recreational drugs and smuggled into China, where it annually killed 100,000 Chinese youth, year after year?

What if 10,000 Americans this year illegally crossed the Indian border into China and disappeared into its interior?

What if an allied Asian nation—such as South Korea, Japan, or Taiwan—went nuclear. And what if, in North-Korean style, it serially blustered to send one of its nuclear missiles into the major cities of China?

What if almost monthly China discovered an American military operative teaching incognito at a major Chinese university or among the ranks of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army?

Would China object if an American femme fatale agent was sleeping with a high-ranking Chinese official of the Chinese communist politburo?

Or what if one of the chauffeurs of its top ranking Chinese officials was a nearly two-decade-long American agent?

What would be the Chinese reaction if there were 350,000 American students attending schools all over the Chinese nation, with perhaps 3,000–4,000 of them actively engaged in national security espionage on behalf of the United States?

These “what-ifs” could be expanded endlessly. But they reflect well enough the great asymmetry in the bizarre Chinese-American relationship.

Obviously, China would not tolerate America treating it as it does the Americans.

Why then does the imbalance continue?

Do naïve Americans believe that the more China is indulged, the more it will respond in kind to American magnanimity?

Does the United States believe that the more China is exposed to our supposedly radically democratic and free culture, the sooner it will become a good democratic citizen of the global community?

Are we afraid of China, because it has four times our population, and believes its economy and military will overtake ours in a decade?

Are we terrified that its Chinese government is completely amoral, utterly ruthless, and capable of anything?

Or are our political, cultural, and corporate elites so compromised by their lucrative Chinese investments and joint ventures, that they prioritize profits over their own country’s national security and self-interest?

And did the Biden family—including President Joe Biden himself—in the past receive millions of dollars from Chinese energy and investment interests?

Did Hunter Biden’s quid pro quo decade of grifting result in millions in Chinese money filling the Biden family coffers—all in exchange for the current Biden and past Obama administrations going soft on Chinese aggression?

No one seems able to explain the otherwise inexplicable.

But one way to get along with China, and to regain its respect is to deal with it exactly the way it deals with the United States.

Anything less, and America will continually be treated with even more Chinese contempt—and eventually extreme violence.

Read Original Article on VictorHanson.com

Victor Davis Hanson
Victor Davis Hansonhttp://victorhanson.com/
Victor Davis Hanson is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow in Residence in Classics and Military History at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, a professor of Classics Emeritus at California State University, Fresno, and a nationally syndicated columnist for Tribune Media Services.

Columns

Illinois Thinks Gov. J.B. Pritzker Sucks!

Illinois Thinks Gov. J.B. Pritzker Sucks! And there are plenty of yard signs sprinkled around the State of Illinois saying so.

Secession’s Hotel California

England’s King George III found out the hard way that the very genesis of the American ethos is running our own affairs liberated from bureaucratic control. 

Vaccine Induced AIDS is a Thing Now

Podcaster Liz Wheeler discusses a Yale Medical School report about mRNA COVID-19 vaccines causing what may now be determined to be "vaccine" induced AIDS.

Feral Pharma-Phile Libs Riot Over RFK Jr. Investigating SSRI Safety

The progressive meltdown ensued after Secretary RFK Jr. confirmed he is going to re-evaluate the scam that is SSRIs, which I have covered at AP previously.

Congressional Millionaires May Get DOGED!

Rumor says 163 members of Congress may undergo a forensic audit by DOGE to determine how their net worth so rapidly outpaced their $174,000 annual salaries.

News

Supreme Court Allows Whistleblower Suit Against Wisconsin Bell

Supreme Court ruled a whistleblower’s fraud lawsuit against a WI telecommunications co. for allegedly overcharging schools for internet services may move forward.

Future Bright for Solar Power, but Slack Times Ahead for Offshore Wind

Wind and solar industries are experiencing divergent trends in wake of Trump’s EOs to unleash fossil fuel development and roll back incentives for renewable energy.
00:01:22

Trump January 6 Indictment Articles

Read January 6 related articles about indictments against Former President Donald Trump.

Buffett Offers Advice to Trump on Government Spending After Paying $26.8 Billion in Tax

In letter to shareholders, Warren Buffett reflected on Berkshire Hathaway’s successes while offering Trump admin some advice on stewardship of the U.S. economy.

Cartel-Linked Smugglers Arrested in US–Mexico Operation

An enforcement operation conducted as part of a bilateral cooperation between the US and Mexico led to disruptions and arrests in human smuggling operations.

Supreme Court Declines to Allow Trump Admin to Immediately Fire Watchdog Official

The U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 21 declined to allow the Trump administration to immediately fire Office of Special Counsel chief Hampton Dellinger.

Grenell Outlines Trump’s Plan to Revamp the Kennedy Center

Richard Grenell, interim executive director of the Kennedy Center in Washington, outlined President Donald Trump’s vision for the performing arts venue.

Nation’s Biggest School Districts Stand to Lose Billions Over Trump’s DEI Order

Five largest U.S. public school districts to lose $5 billion in federal funds per year if they don't comply with Trump’s EOs barring ideologies such as DEI.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central