Trump Train Sued by Biden-Harris Going to Trial

While a lot of people may remember the incident of a Biden-Harris bus surrounded by drivers of a Trump Train during the 2020 General Election cycle, few might realize that they broke no driving laws so were never charged so Biden and Harris (apparently) shopped for a judge that would allow them to apply a KKK era law to sue them.

Former college swimmer Riley Gaines, of the University of Kentucky NCAA swim team who lost out to a male pretending to be a woman now has her own podcast, Gaines for Girls.

In a recent episode she featured guest Joeylynn Mesaros who shared her experience of being involved in a civil lawsuit brought by officials of the Biden administration and Democrat politicians. The lawsuit came after an incident in 2020 where Mesaros, and others, drove alongside the Biden campaign bus with Trump flags. The plaintiffs claimed emotional distress, but Mesaros sees it as an attempt to suppress free speech. In her interview she discussed the challenges she has faced, including being labeled as a political extremist and receiving death threats. Despite these obstacles, she remains committed to fighting for free speech rights.

“Joe Biden’s LAWFARE Against Trump Supporters | Joeylynn Mesaros | Gaines for Girls with Riley Gaines” – OutKick

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman recently released a lengthy opinion explaining why “Trump Train” participants are heading towards trial in a Ku Klux Klan Act lawsuit filed over the October 30, 2020 surrounding of a Biden-Harris bus on I-35 in Texas. He wrote in his opinion that a “reasonable jury” could find “force, intimidation, or threat[s]” were used to “interfere with Plaintiffs’ rights to support or advocate for their candidates for President and Vice President” and that the claim can survive without a “showing of racial or class-based animus.”

Judge Pitman also denied summary judgment motions that were filed by defendants Eliazar Cisneros, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, and Dolores Park, siding with the KKK Act, civil conspiracy, and civil assault plaintiffs Wendy Davis — a Democratic former member of the Texas Senate — former Biden-Harris campaign staffer David Gins, and bus driver Tim Holloway. This now sets the stage for a September trial, nearly four years after the incident that triggered this case.

Pitman, is an appointee appointed under former president Barack Obama (D) appointee. The Vote Smart website shows his life partner is one David Smith. The website ALM |Law reports, “Pitman was the first openly gay U.S. attorney in Texas and the first openly gay judge on the federal bench in the Fifth Circuit.”

Pitman initially issued his ruling under seal, but his public filing shows his view is that the KKK Act of 1871 “establishes an independent substantive right to engage in support or advocacy in federal elections that extends beyond the act of voting” itself. He wrote:

“Although the methods of political intimidation may change over time and require adapting the Klan Act to new contexts, the conduct alleged here requires no such adaption; the Defendants’ alleged conduct is similar to a type of political violence that the Klan engaged in at the time of the Act’s enactment,” Pitman wrote in one part of the ruling, providing an example from 1868 of where a wagon full of 36 Republican ‘young ladies’ on the way to a political rally crashed due to an act of ‘Ku-Klux treachery’”.

The Biden-Harris bus did not crash but plaintiffs allege they feared that was a possibility. A video from that day showed there was a collision between a car directly behind the bus driven by a Biden-Harris staffer and the truck driven by Cisneros.

The judge wrote in his opinion Cisneros “later described” that collision as “‘me slamming that f****r’ and ‘welcom[ing] him properly to Texas.’”

Cisneros argued what the Biden-Harris associated plaintiffs called an “ambush” and “assault,” among “other choice words,” was actually a “Trump Train” which is an exercise protected in First Amendment rights as “a demonstration of support for their favorite candidate for President of the United States,” Donald Trump. However, the judge wrote that the First Amendment is not a shield for “allegedly threatening Plaintiffs with reckless driving” just like the First Amendment “does not protect a driver waving a political flag from running a red light” or somehow transform that violation into “expressive conduct.”

“A jury could reasonably find that Defendants unlawfully conspired and drove in a dangerous manner such that they threatened or assaulted Plaintiffs,” Pitman wrote. “If a jury accepts these allegations, Defendants’ First Amendment defense must fail because assaulting, intimidating, or imminently threatening others with force is not protected expression. And to the extent that Defendants’ conduct contained any pure speech, such speech would also be excluded from First Amendment protection because it was incidental to tortious behavior or constituted a true threat.”

CONCLUSION:

This seems to be yet another example of Democrats shopping for a progressive liberal judge to accommodate their abuse of the law which leads to the modern day phenomena of “lawfare”. It is up to local law enforcement to determine reckless, unsafe, or illegal driving practices, not a civil court judge listening to hearsay.

I feel mentally fragile every time a Democrat takes office and my wallet gets more empty but that does not give me grounds for a civil suit against the DNC!

Realistically this is just another example of liberal Democrats trying to use the law to intimidate conservative Republicans. It is an inappropriate case filed in a lower court that would not stand up in a higher court.

Because Trump supporters made you feel scared because they outnumbered you and surrounded you does not entitle you to damages! If Judge Pitman was not in on the ruse, he should have told the plaintiffs to get over themselves and grow up and, “Case dismissed!”  

Judge Pitman is now guilty of partisanship on the bench. He is trying to apply a law intended to prosecute racism where no racism occurred which means he, once again, is another Democrat trying to portray Republicans as racists. He, himself, is thus guilty of malpractice as anybody can see the wrap on the Biden-Harris bus would not have allowed anybody outside to know what color the occupants inside were.

Read Judge Pitman’s order.

You can view the incident here:

“FBI investigating ‘Trump Train’ swarming Biden bus on Texas interstate: Report” – Fox News

Copyright © 2024 by Mark S. Schwendau

Mark Schwendau
Mark Schwendauhttps://www.idrawiwrite.tech/
If there is a "CONSPIRACY" THEORY Mark Schwendau won't miss out telling you about it. He is a retired college technology educator and author in Illinois. He holds a BS degree in technology education and a MS degree in industrial management. He has had news articles published in online news journals such as Communities Digital News and Independent Sentinel. His opinions are his own as assured by the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Columns

A Simple Question

What is a woman? Anyone with an IQ above room temperature can answer the question. Everyone, that is, except Democrats.

Democrats Tesla Takedown is a Proven Astro Turf Movement

Elon Musk and other journalistic leaders like Joe Rogan have been asking the critical question, “Who is behind the organization of these Tesla protests?”

Can Ramaphosa and Trump Come to Terms?

Whether South Africa can quell the hostility emanating from Washington, without compromising on its national priorities, is a formidable test for a country

Maddened Europe

Viable prospects for peaceful settlement of conflict between Moscow and Kyiv exist, but Europe obsesses over threat of incursion onto European territory.

BOMBSHELL: DOGE Proves Democrats Guilty of Election Fraud!

As the old expression goes, “That didn’t take long!” Over...

News

Crawford Defeats Musk-Backed Rival to Preserve Liberal Majority on Wisconsin Supreme Court

Judge Susan Crawford, backed by in-state Democrats and supported by millions in out-of-state donations, won most expensive Supreme Court seat in state history.

Victory! Federal Court Orders Parental Notice Laws Restored to Protect Minors Seeking Abortion, in a case almost 40 years in the making.

Teaming up with public officials, the Bopp Law Firm and Nevada Right to Life, PJI took a stand in federal court to restore protections for young girls, the preborn and parents.

Trump Says Agency Heads Will Work With DOGE After Elon Musk Leaves

President Donald Trump said adviser Elon Musk will eventually have to depart from the DOGE and go back to running his companies.

FTC Chairman Raises Concerns Over Sale of 23andMe DNA Data

FTC said it was worried about the safety of the personal data of Americans who were previously customers of genetic testing company 23andMe.

Judge Dismisses COVID Lawsuit Against Former New York Gov. Cuomo

Judge dismissed class-action lawsuit against former Gov. Andrew Cuomo that blamed his admin for COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes across NY.

Tesla Firebombing Suspect Hit With Federal Charges

The U.S. Dept of Justice has filed federal charges against a suspect in connection with a firebombing attack on a Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado.

What to Expect From Trump’s Global Tariffs

Trump has dubbed April 2 “Liberation Day,” when he will unveil reciprocal tariffs to level the trading field between the United States and its 200 partners.

Voters Head to Polls in 3 Key Elections in Florida, Wisconsin: What to Watch For

On April 1, voters head to the polls for three races in Florida and Wisconsin, with substantial implications for the future beyond the current contests.
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

MAGA Business Central