Un-redacted File Exposes Biden’s Involvement in Trump Case

It has been nothing less than entertaining watching the 4 criminal court cases against former President Donald Trump unravel and implode in real time. One can imagine it should result in the loss of law licenses for those involved. The prosecutors are now all so hated it is tough to say which one Americans hate most.

Jack Smith’s Classified Documents Case in Florida just took a serious blow for him. Smith had petitioned the court to keep certain documents redacted from public view but Judge Aileen Cannon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida seemingly could not see the legal justification for doing so.

One un-redacted file in particular began to circulate social media platforms today exposing yet another lie of Joe Biden’s administration which includes Attorney General Merrick Garland of the DOJ. The lie relates to Garland’s association with Jack Smith about “independence” from investigations into Trump. The newly un-redacted file reveals the Biden White House and DOJ were involved in developing a criminal case against former President Trump for records mismanagement. The first stab at the bogus charges seemingly related to alleged “destruction” of government papers.

Contrary to public and legal assertions, the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) WAS working with the DOJ and White House to craft a criminal referral by September of 2021 which was five months prior to the “official” referral by NARA to the DOJ in February of 2022.

Now we know why insiders like Andrew Weissmann and Barb McQuade were so desperate to get rid of Judge Cannon. Andrew Weissmann (D) is a professor of practice at New York University School of Law. He served as a lead prosecutor in Robert S. Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office, the FBI general counsel, director of the Enron Task Force, was chief of the DOJ’s Fraud Section, and chief of the Criminal Division in the Eastern District of New York. He is a regular commentator on MSNBC and cohost of the podcast Prosecuting Donald Trump. He is author of the New York Times bestseller “Where Law Ends: Inside the Mueller Investigation”. Barbara McQuade is (D) is a professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School. She served as the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan from 2010 to 2017. She stepped down in March 2017 as part of President Donald Trump’s 2017 dismissal of U.S. attorneys. She is author of “Attack from Within” and serves as a legal analyst for NBC News and MSNBC.

This story appears to have been first posted by fellow Illinois journalist Julie Kelly on “X” (formerly Twitter) here:

You can read more articles from Julie Kelly on Declassified With Julie Kelly on Substack.

Kelly is the author of two books, “Disloyal Opposition: How the NeverTrump Right Tried and Failed to Take Down the President,” and “January 6: How Democrats Used the Capitol Protest to Launch a War on Terror Against the Political Right.” Her past writings can be found at the Federalist and National Review as well as guest editorials in the Wall Street Journal, Roll Call, Forbes, and the Hill. She has been a frequent guest of Tucker Carlson.

CONCLUSION:

Some partisan hacks of the left have been openly and wrongfully attacking Judge Aileen Cannon accusing her of being biases towards former President Donald Trump. At the least they are wrong and at the most they are liars as Judge Cannon is simply following the law as illustrated here:

 Executive Order 13526 Sec 1.7

“Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:

(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;

(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

(3) restrain competition; or

(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.”

Judge Cannon has shown great courage and the ability to rule justly in this matter. Now, incriminating evidence of Biden’s WH and DOJ involvement in this investigation that would have been buried forever has been exposed to the light of day.

Many legal experts observing this case are waiting for other shoes to drop as well.

For example; Jack Smith is not a legitimate special counsel as he was never confirmed by the Senate to be a special counsel. Also, evidence presented in the overtly Democrat biased Washington, DC for processing and grand jury proceedings brought back to Florida for trial may not even be legal.

The worst part of this case is the documents former Senator Joe Biden stole as Senator is a far more serious offense than documents legally possessed by former President Donald Trump he is allowed to have for a period of 5 years after leaving office in accordance with the Presidential Records Act.

 Special counsel Robert Hur found Joe Biden to be “an elderly man with a poor memory” and thus he was not charged or will not stand trial. That being the case, the 25^th Amendment to our Constitution should come into play and Biden is also unfit to hold our highest office. See the Democrats hypocrisy showing here?!

So the partisan Democrats of Congress and the DOJ/FBI are okay with Joe Biden having stolen classified documents in 4 separate unsecured locations of Washington’s Chinatown, his Delaware home garage, the Boston law office of his personal attorney Pat Moore, and the Penn Center at the University of Pennsylvania but they are NOT okay with Donald Trump having his presidential documents at a the very secure Mar-a-Lago private club compound and residence.

Extreme hypocrisy is a sign of extreme insanity.  

Copyright © 2024 by Mark S. Schwendau